Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on BSC
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:13:16 UTC
| Metric | BNB Chain | PublicNode |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 |
| Score | 95.6 | 86.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.99% | 99.98% |
| p50 latency | 18.3 ms | 30.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 25.3 ms | 56.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 43.3 ms | 172.6 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.98% |
| Head lag | 4.63 blocks | 4.01 blocks |
| Rate limited | 163 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 17,043 | 8,516 |
5 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against BNB Chain, the highest scorer of those selected.
BNB ChainvsPublicNode
+9.5points
- Latency+9.9
- Head freshness−0.5
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +9.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.