Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Not sure who to compare?Start from who leads, then compareThe ranked answer per chain, with the figures that produced it.

Providers on BSC

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 17:59:27 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricBNB Chain1RPC
Rank25
Score95.728.2
StatusExcellentPoor
Availability100.00%9.50%
p50 latency18.1 ms716.3 ms
p95 latency25.0 ms5991.9 ms
p99 latency40.9 ms8622.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%
Head lag4.55 blocks6.57 blocks
Rate limited7645,322
Unsupported01
Samples78,38513,028

5 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against BNB Chain, the highest scorer of those selected.

BNB Chainvs1RPC

+67.5points

  • Availability+36.2
  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness+1.3
  • Correctness−0.0

The parts add to +67.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time