Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on BSC
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-10-08 20:50:54 UTC
| Metric | NodeReal | PublicNode | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Score | 97.3 | 86.9 | 37.2 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Poor |
| Availability | 99.76% | 99.96% | 32.74% |
| p50 latency | 18.8 ms | 29.7 ms | 1358.8 ms |
| p95 latency | 27.1 ms | 54.0 ms | 7334.3 ms |
| p99 latency | 61.7 ms | 214.3 ms | 8983.2 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 99.98% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 1.73 blocks | 3.97 blocks | 7.15 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 1,511 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,335 | 9,557 | 2,479 |
5 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against NodeReal, the highest scorer of those selected.
NodeRealvsPublicNode
+10.5points
- Latency+8.6
- Head freshness+2.0
- Availability−0.1
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +10.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
NodeRealvs1RPC
+60.1points
- Latency+29.4
- Availability+26.8
- Head freshness+4.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +60.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.