Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on BSC
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:27:31 UTC
| Metric | NodeReal | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 5 |
| Score | 97.6 | 0.0 |
| Status | Excellent | Poor |
| Availability | 100.00% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.2 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 25.2 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 67.4 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | not measured |
| Head lag | 1.62 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 269 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,583 | 320 |
5 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against NodeReal, the highest scorer of those selected.
NodeRealvs1RPC
+97.6points
- Availability+40.0
- Latency*+29.5
- Correctness*+20.0
- Head freshness*+8.2
The parts add to +97.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.