Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on BSC
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-10-08 18:13:28 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 3 | 5 |
| Score | 81.1 | 0.0 |
| Status | Good | Poor |
| Availability | 99.94% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 30.0 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 53.8 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 204.8 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.94% | not measured |
| Head lag | 3.97 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 264 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,612 | 316 |
5 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevs1RPC
+81.1points
- Availability+40.0
- Correctness*+20.0
- Latency*+15.1
- Head freshness*+6.1
The parts add to +81.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.