Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:02:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCBlast API
Rank1235
Score99.495.289.078.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.98%99.99%99.94%99.99%
p50 latency20.2 ms25.3 ms34.4 ms108.7 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms49.3 ms70.2 ms127.4 ms
p99 latency65.2 ms111.4 ms185.1 ms153.4 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.36 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited002044
Unsupported0000
Samples8,1918,2518,0298,165

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.2points

  • Latency+4.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0

The parts add to +4.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.4points

  • Latency+10.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time