Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:19:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealBlast API
Rank2345
Score96.192.387.785.0
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.83%99.98%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms104.9 ms
p95 latency53.7 ms71.9 ms100.1 ms122.3 ms
p99 latency774.9 ms168.3 ms126.0 ms146.3 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited064101,154
Unsupported0000
Samples106,381104,619104,578105,809

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.8points

  • Latency+4.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.3points

  • Latency+8.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+11.1points

  • Latency+11.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time