Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:46:13 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | Blast API |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Score | 95.3 | 88.0 | 85.3 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.81% | 99.98% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 87.4 ms | 104.6 ms |
| p95 latency | 58.8 ms | 100.1 ms | 122.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 813.1 ms | 125.7 ms | 145.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.35 blocks | 0.42 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 1,113 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 98,997 | 97,342 | 98,443 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+7.2points
- Latency+7.4
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +7.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsBlast API
+10.0points
- Latency+10.1
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +10.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.