Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 16:06:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank2358
Score96.492.284.962.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms105.0 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency51.8 ms71.8 ms122.5 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency759.0 ms169.5 ms147.0 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.42 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited06451,18018,765
Unsupported0000
Samples109,276107,462108,70322,905

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.3points

  • Latency+4.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+11.5points

  • Latency+11.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.0points

  • Latency+27.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time