Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:29:53 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank2358
Score93.993.686.062.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%85.50%
p50 latency19.9 ms34.0 ms104.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency70.4 ms72.6 ms122.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency872.7 ms169.3 ms144.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.42 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited056597614,960
Unsupported0000
Samples87,23185,79186,66918,545

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+0.3points

  • Latency+0.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +0.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+7.9points

  • Latency+8.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +7.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+31.3points

  • Latency+24.5
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +31.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time