Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:06:31 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank1569
Score99.478.770.10.0
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedPoor
Availability99.94%100.00%100.00%0.00%
p50 latency20.0 ms107.6 ms108.0 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms124.7 ms200.3 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency103.2 ms153.6 ms231.3 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.49 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0781,3241,425
Unsupported00160
Samples8,2848,2791,9651,635

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+20.7points

  • Latency+20.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +20.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+29.3points

  • Latency+29.3
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+99.4points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+30.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +99.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time