Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:20:14 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score96.185.078.562.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.9 ms106.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency53.7 ms122.3 ms196.1 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency774.7 ms146.3 ms243.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,15417,09918,265
Unsupported002070
Samples106,413105,84224,64322,334

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+11.1points

  • Latency+11.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.6points

  • Latency+17.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.7points

  • Latency+26.7
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time