Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:24:39 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank1568
Score99.484.778.462.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.3 ms105.2 ms107.0 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency35.7 ms122.7 ms195.6 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency76.4 ms147.8 ms242.6 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.42 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,21818,38719,691
Unsupported002250
Samples115,523114,05026,55423,964

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsBlast API

+14.7points

  • Latency+14.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +14.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+21.0points

  • Latency+21.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time