Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 23:42:30 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score98.984.178.064.1
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.98%100.00%89.01%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.3 ms107.0 ms259.6 ms
p95 latency37.4 ms121.0 ms195.7 ms2579.7 ms
p99 latency251.5 ms140.5 ms240.0 ms4625.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%98.18%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.42 blocks0.46 blocks0.94 blocks
Rate limited03716,1576,579
Unsupported00800
Samples38,41538,1868,8737,878

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+14.7points

  • Latency+14.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+20.8points

  • Latency+20.9
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.7points

  • Latency+29.5
  • Availability+4.4
  • Head freshness+0.5
  • Correctness+0.4

The parts add to +34.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time