Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:42:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2578
Score99.284.077.058.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%99.91%75.73%
p50 latency19.6 ms104.7 ms119.6 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency36.2 ms121.4 ms210.4 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency173.0 ms143.0 ms234.1 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.41 blocks0.39 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited029526,583
Unsupported0000
Samples38,39338,19338,3407,899

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.2points

  • Latency+15.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.1points

  • Latency+22.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.7points

  • Latency+29.8
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time