Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:15:57 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank2358
Score99.191.284.158.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.92%99.98%75.73%
p50 latency19.8 ms34.1 ms104.5 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency36.8 ms69.2 ms121.1 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency212.4 ms171.4 ms140.7 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.42 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited01252666,462
Unsupported0000
Samples37,68837,09937,4747,759

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+7.9points

  • Latency+8.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+15.0points

  • Latency+15.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +15.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+40.6points

  • Latency+29.7
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time