Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:56:02 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCBlast API1RPC
Rank2358
Score95.392.685.362.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms104.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency58.6 ms71.9 ms122.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency812.3 ms167.7 ms145.4 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.42 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited06151,11417,040
Unsupported0000
Samples99,25797,63198,70720,928

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+2.7points

  • Latency+2.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+10.0points

  • Latency+10.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.8points

  • Latency+25.9
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time