Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
7d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 08:26:47 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | Blast API | Merkle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Score | 95.1 | 85.3 | 78.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.98% | 99.98% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 104.5 ms | 106.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 59.8 ms | 122.0 ms | 195.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 819.6 ms | 144.8 ms | 243.2 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.42 blocks | 0.48 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 1,078 | 15,579 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 189 |
| Samples | 96,852 | 96,297 | 22,390 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsBlast API
+9.8points
- Latency+9.9
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +9.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMerkle
+16.4points
- Latency+16.5
- Head freshness−0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +16.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.