Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:01:20 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMerkle1RPC
Rank2568
Score94.385.879.062.6
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.98%85.50%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.5 ms106.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency67.2 ms122.1 ms196.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency860.0 ms144.2 ms244.4 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.42 blocks0.47 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited098714,45215,387
Unsupported001790
Samples89,69589,14520,77119,035

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+8.4points

  • Latency+8.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+15.3points

  • Latency+15.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +15.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+31.6points

  • Latency+24.9
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +31.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time