Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:18:42 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC
Rank123
Score99.495.788.2
StatusExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.94%99.98%99.95%
p50 latency20.2 ms24.5 ms33.9 ms
p95 latency34.3 ms48.3 ms73.6 ms
p99 latency78.0 ms122.2 ms173.5 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.36 blocks
Rate limited0037
Unsupported000
Samples8,6208,6828,462

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+3.7points

  • Latency+3.7
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +3.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.2points

  • Latency+11.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time