Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:32:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank267
Score95.378.677.8
StatusExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms106.4 ms118.6 ms
p95 latency58.9 ms196.1 ms209.3 ms
p99 latency812.5 ms243.1 ms232.7 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited015,8693
Unsupported01940
Samples98,61422,80998,443

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.6points

  • Latency+16.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.4points

  • Latency+17.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time