Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:56:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker
Rank237
Score96.792.177.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms119.2 ms
p95 latency50.4 ms71.7 ms210.2 ms
p99 latency741.0 ms169.9 ms233.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited06543
Unsupported000
Samples112,259110,412112,042

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.6points

  • Latency+4.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.2points

  • Latency+19.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time