Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:35 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker
Rank137
Score99.488.169.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.95%99.95%99.91%
p50 latency20.1 ms34.2 ms123.9 ms
p95 latency34.5 ms74.1 ms214.9 ms
p99 latency77.6 ms185.1 ms237.4 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.36 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited0400
Unsupported000
Samples9,6419,4789,603

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.2points

  • Latency+11.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time