Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-28 01:11:18 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Score | 98.8 | 91.8 | 86.1 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 100.00% | 99.87% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 18.2 ms | 32.5 ms | 87.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 31.9 ms | 59.0 ms | 98.1 ms |
| p99 latency | 53.3 ms | 188.4 ms | 109.8 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 99.87% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.48 blocks | 0.38 blocks | 0.33 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 1,596 | 1,571 | 1,566 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+7.0points
- Latency+7.0
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +7.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+12.7points
- Latency+12.9
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +12.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.