Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:56:49 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 4 |
| Score | 96.2 | 87.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.83% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 87.4 ms |
| p95 latency | 53.0 ms | 100.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 769.7 ms | 126.0 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.35 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 107,394 | 105,584 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+8.5points
- Latency+8.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +8.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.