Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:54:33 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricMerkle1RPCCloudflare
Rank689
Score78.862.555.4
StatusGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%85.27%23.11%
p50 latency106.5 ms225.7 ms15.0 ms
p95 latency195.5 ms4391.3 ms87.3 ms
p99 latency243.2 ms7602.5 ms252.9 ms
Correctness100.00%97.48%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.91 blocksno cohort
Rate limited15,15716,18977
Unsupported18302,774
Samples21,79319,95494,183

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Merkle, the highest scorer of those selected.

Merklevs1RPC

+16.2points

  • Latency+9.3
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +16.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

MerklevsCloudflare

+23.4points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency13.6
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +23.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time