Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:17:26 UTC
| Metric | dRPC | NodeReal | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Score | 87.8 | 82.7 | 0.0 |
| Status | Good | Good | Poor |
| Availability | 99.94% | 100.00% | 0.00% |
| p50 latency | 33.6 ms | 87.8 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p95 latency | 74.5 ms | 99.6 ms | 0.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 176.4 ms | 123.9 ms | 0.0 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | not measured |
| Head lag | 0.35 blocks | 0.34 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 40 | 0 | 1,475 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 8,439 | 8,428 | 1,691 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.
dRPCvsNodeReal
+5.1points
- Latency+5.2
- Availability−0.0
- Head freshness−0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +5.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
dRPCvs1RPC
+87.8points
- Availability+40.0
- Correctness*+20.0
- Latency*+18.3
- Head freshness*+9.6
The parts add to +87.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.