Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:59:29 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPC1RPC
Rank239
Score95.588.10.0
StatusExcellentGoodPoor
Availability99.98%99.95%0.00%
p50 latency24.7 ms34.2 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency49.0 ms74.2 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency117.2 ms183.6 ms0.0 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.49 blocks0.36 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0401,672
Unsupported000
Samples9,7949,5471,917

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+7.4points

  • Latency+7.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+95.5points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+26.1
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +95.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time