Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 00:25:42 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPCCloudflare
Rank139
Score99.491.352.4
StatusExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.92%23.10%
p50 latency18.4 ms34.1 ms16.2 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms68.6 ms93.5 ms
p99 latency73.5 ms168.9 ms247.5 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.37 blocksno cohort
Rate limited012545
Unsupported001,121
Samples38,24937,34237,887

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+8.1points

  • Latency+8.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+47.0points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+10.1
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +47.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time