Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:42:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyCloudflare
Rank129
Score99.499.252.3
StatusExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%23.13%
p50 latency18.3 ms19.6 ms16.1 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms36.2 ms93.7 ms
p99 latency73.8 ms173.0 ms246.4 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0036
Unsupported001,134
Samples38,71438,39338,360

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+47.1points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+10.2
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +47.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time