Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:19:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyCloudflare
Rank139
Score99.493.356.1
StatusExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.97%99.96%23.10%
p50 latency18.3 ms19.9 ms15.3 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms74.3 ms89.5 ms
p99 latency70.5 ms883.7 ms254.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0077
Unsupported002,507
Samples85,95485,31585,119

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+6.1points

  • Latency+6.1
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+43.3points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+6.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +43.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time