Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:22:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPCCloudflare
Rank139
Score99.493.555.9
StatusExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.97%99.93%23.10%
p50 latency18.3 ms34.0 ms15.2 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms72.6 ms88.8 ms
p99 latency70.5 ms169.2 ms254.2 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.36 blocksno cohort
Rate limited056977
Unsupported002,603
Samples89,30487,17388,443

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+5.9points

  • Latency+6.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+43.5points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+6.6
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +43.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time