Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-26 22:28:38 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC
Rank123
Score99.497.486.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGood
Availability100.00%100.00%99.74%
p50 latency18.4 ms16.9 ms34.3 ms
p95 latency31.3 ms38.2 ms72.1 ms
p99 latency63.1 ms95.0 ms208.7 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.53 blocks0.47 blocks0.38 blocks
Rate limited009
Unsupported000
Samples1,6011,6221,568

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+2.0points

  • Latency+2.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +2.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+12.5points

  • Latency+12.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time