Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:38:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC
Rank123
Score99.499.290.7
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellent
Availability100.00%99.99%99.97%
p50 latency18.5 ms17.4 ms32.6 ms
p95 latency32.1 ms33.0 ms67.0 ms
p99 latency66.8 ms74.7 ms161.5 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks
Rate limited0031
Unsupported000
Samples9,1239,2239,010

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.7points

  • Latency+8.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time