Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:18:42 UTC
| Metric | PublicNode | Merkle |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 6 |
| Score | 95.7 | 70.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.98% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 24.5 ms | 108.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 48.3 ms | 197.2 ms |
| p99 latency | 122.2 ms | 231.3 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.46 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 1,355 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 16 |
| Samples | 8,682 | 2,015 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.
PublicNodevsMerkle
+25.2points
- Latency+25.3
- Head freshness−0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +25.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.