Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:52:13 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMEV Blocker
Rank127
Score99.496.777.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.96%99.89%
p50 latency19.2 ms19.8 ms119.2 ms
p95 latency35.4 ms50.4 ms210.2 ms
p99 latency75.4 ms741.8 ms233.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited003
Unsupported000
Samples112,997112,137111,920

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+2.7points

  • Latency+2.7
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.9points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time