Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:27:08 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPC
Rank123
Score99.495.388.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.99%99.95%
p50 latency20.2 ms25.0 ms34.3 ms
p95 latency33.8 ms49.5 ms71.3 ms
p99 latency64.8 ms111.6 ms185.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.36 blocks
Rate limited0030
Unsupported000
Samples8,8508,9138,689

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.1points

  • Latency+4.1
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +4.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+10.6points

  • Latency+10.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time