Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 23:00:21 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | PublicNode |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 |
| Score | 99.4 | 97.7 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent |
| Availability | 99.98% | 99.99% |
| p50 latency | 19.2 ms | 21.8 ms |
| p95 latency | 33.0 ms | 41.7 ms |
| p99 latency | 71.7 ms | 100.2 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.48 blocks | 0.48 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 37,267 | 37,597 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsPublicNode
+1.7points
- Latency+1.7
- Head freshness+0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +1.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.