Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:21:46 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPC1RPCCloudflare
Rank2389
Score97.991.058.053.6
StatusExcellentExcellentDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%99.94%74.55%23.16%
p50 latency20.9 ms33.6 ms2024.4 ms15.0 ms
p95 latency40.8 ms70.7 ms6590.4 ms85.8 ms
p99 latency100.1 ms175.7 ms9196.2 ms248.1 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%96.63%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.95 blocksno cohort
Rate limited01336,49336
Unsupported0001,113
Samples38,17937,2367,79637,870

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+6.9points

  • Latency+7.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +6.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+39.9points

  • Latency+28.5
  • Availability+10.2
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +39.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+44.3points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+7.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +44.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time