Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:06:40 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMerkleCloudflare
Rank268
Score95.270.947.6
StatusExcellentDegradedPoor
Availability99.99%100.00%23.18%
p50 latency25.0 ms109.8 ms16.8 ms
p95 latency49.6 ms191.2 ms97.7 ms
p99 latency113.1 ms277.4 ms166.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.44 blocksno cohort
Rate limited01,3070
Unsupported012243
Samples8,3551,9218,290

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+24.3points

  • Latency+24.4
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +24.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+47.6points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+10.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +47.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time