Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:23:54 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMEV BlockerCloudflare
Rank179
Score99.477.554.3
StatusExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.89%23.11%
p50 latency19.2 ms119.2 ms15.3 ms
p95 latency35.5 ms210.3 ms89.1 ms
p99 latency76.0 ms233.9 ms252.4 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.40 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0396
Unsupported003,323
Samples113,869112,775112,807

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.9points

  • Latency+22.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+45.1points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+8.2
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +45.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time