Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 00:01:24 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeCloudflare1RPC
Rank189
Score99.447.40.0
StatusExcellentPoorPoor
Availability99.98%23.10%0.00%
p50 latency18.4 ms16.2 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency35.0 ms94.0 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency73.5 ms247.5 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.49 blocksno cohortno cohort
Rate limited0396,415
Unsupported01,1020
Samples37,59137,2347,350

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+52.0points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+15.1
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +52.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+99.4points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+30.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +99.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time