Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 02:31:35 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 9 |
| Score | 93.9 | 56.0 |
| Status | Excellent | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.96% | 23.10% |
| p50 latency | 19.9 ms | 15.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 70.4 ms | 89.0 ms |
| p99 latency | 872.5 ms | 254.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.51 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 77 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 2,564 |
| Samples | 87,280 | 87,078 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsCloudflare
+37.9points
- Availability+29.7
- Head freshness*+9.4
- Correctness−2.2
- Latency+1.1
The parts add to +37.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.