Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:29:07 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricdRPCMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank3678
Score92.278.577.662.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.93%99.98%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency33.8 ms106.6 ms118.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency71.9 ms196.1 ms209.8 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency168.4 ms243.4 ms233.2 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited64117,133318,306
Unsupported020700
Samples104,89124,699106,44922,380

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.

dRPCvsMerkle

+13.8points

  • Latency+13.6
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvsMEV Blocker

+14.6points

  • Latency+14.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvs1RPC

+29.8points

  • Latency+22.7
  • Availability+6.0
  • Head freshness+0.6
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +29.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time