Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.5 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 08:36:00 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2367
Score95.192.778.777.8
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms106.4 ms118.5 ms
p95 latency59.6 ms71.8 ms195.6 ms209.2 ms
p99 latency818.7 ms167.5 ms243.2 ms232.8 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited060115,6173
Unsupported001890
Samples97,09995,50422,44396,930

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+2.4points

  • Latency+2.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.3points

  • Latency+17.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time