Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:29:48 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank1346
Score99.484.683.170.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.94%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency21.0 ms33.9 ms87.4 ms112.0 ms
p95 latency34.2 ms90.2 ms98.8 ms204.6 ms
p99 latency66.8 ms193.6 ms120.9 ms217.6 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.38 blocks0.32 blocks0.20 blocks
Rate limited090253
Unsupported0002
Samples1,6221,5871,584368

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+14.8points

  • Latency+14.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.3points

  • Latency+16.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.9points

  • Latency+29.3
  • Head freshness0.4
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time