Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:53:32 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank1346
Score99.489.886.277.6
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.99%99.86%99.99%100.00%
p50 latency19.0 ms34.1 ms87.0 ms105.9 ms
p95 latency32.2 ms73.2 ms99.3 ms193.5 ms
p99 latency71.8 ms179.0 ms122.1 ms220.4 ms
Correctness100.00%99.98%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.39 blocks0.33 blocks0.51 blocks
Rate limited03301,481
Unsupported00018
Samples9,5169,3839,3802,128

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.6points

  • Latency+9.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.2points

  • Latency+13.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0

The parts add to +13.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.8points

  • Latency+21.8
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time