Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:27:09 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank1346
Score99.486.982.570.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.93%99.95%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency19.6 ms33.1 ms87.8 ms106.8 ms
p95 latency35.1 ms77.7 ms99.8 ms202.1 ms
p99 latency126.9 ms176.0 ms123.1 ms231.3 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.36 blocks0.34 blocks0.50 blocks
Rate limited04501,428
Unsupported00017
Samples8,8358,6968,6782,092

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+12.5points

  • Latency+12.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.9points

  • Latency+17.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.4
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time