Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:49:50 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricdRPCMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank3678
Score92.578.677.762.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.93%99.98%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency33.8 ms106.4 ms118.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency72.0 ms195.9 ms209.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency168.0 ms243.2 ms232.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited62516,198317,290
Unsupported019800
Samples99,06323,333100,53021,212

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.

dRPCvsMerkle

+13.9points

  • Latency+13.8
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvsMEV Blocker

+14.8points

  • Latency+14.7
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvs1RPC

+30.0points

  • Latency+23.0
  • Availability+5.9
  • Head freshness+0.6
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +30.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time