Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:20:40 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2367
Score94.893.078.877.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.93%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms106.5 ms118.5 ms
p95 latency62.3 ms71.9 ms195.7 ms209.2 ms
p99 latency836.8 ms167.7 ms244.4 ms232.7 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.47 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited058615,0272
Unsupported001830
Samples93,45391,91021,60493,286

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+1.9points

  • Latency+2.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.0points

  • Latency+16.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.9points

  • Latency+17.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time